<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPods and ITunes: Productive or destructive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/04/27/itunes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/04/27/itunes/</link>
	<description>technology, libraries, and schools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:49:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Adkins</title>
		<link>http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/04/27/itunes/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Adkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 01:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/04/27/itunes/#comment-881</guid>
		<description>I remember when I was in school and those calculator watches were banned because they &quot;caused cheating&quot;. I don&#039;t think any electronic device causes cheating. And I think that if our kids are finding ways to cheat with these things; then maybe we need to rethink how we test so they can&#039;t cheat. How about using applied use of vocabulary instead of memorization? What about the idea of updating test banks instead of using the same notes, handouts, quizzes, tests each year? What about using relevant testing methods in a relevant curriculum?

It just frustrates me that people jump to the conclusion of removing these resources without giving them an adequate chance in the classroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when I was in school and those calculator watches were banned because they &#8220;caused cheating&#8221;. I don&#8217;t think any electronic device causes cheating. And I think that if our kids are finding ways to cheat with these things; then maybe we need to rethink how we test so they can&#8217;t cheat. How about using applied use of vocabulary instead of memorization? What about the idea of updating test banks instead of using the same notes, handouts, quizzes, tests each year? What about using relevant testing methods in a relevant curriculum?</p>
<p>It just frustrates me that people jump to the conclusion of removing these resources without giving them an adequate chance in the classroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Schwister</title>
		<link>http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/04/27/itunes/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schwister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/04/27/itunes/#comment-879</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that headline is unfortunate in that it oversimplifies the issues and presses the fear/hysteria button. Thanks for your thoughtful elaboration on what those issues, and possible solutions, really are. A colleague and I were talking about the &quot;cheating&quot; issue the other day. Her comment was that it&#039;s a red herring: our focus should be on effective teaching structured around essential questions---instruction that can&#039;t be reduced to a downloadable set of answers.  

I like your point about academic integrity and bringing ethics into the conversation. The cheating question has always seemed to me to be related to the question of why we&#039;re in school, intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation, etc.  If students are motivated to learn for authentic reasons and are acting as advocates of their own learning, cheating  becomes reductio ad absurdum. Have to say though: being an advocate for one&#039;s own learning is not the same as being an advocate for one&#039;s academic &quot;career.&quot; So there&#039;s the usual grain of salt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that headline is unfortunate in that it oversimplifies the issues and presses the fear/hysteria button. Thanks for your thoughtful elaboration on what those issues, and possible solutions, really are. A colleague and I were talking about the &#8220;cheating&#8221; issue the other day. Her comment was that it&#8217;s a red herring: our focus should be on effective teaching structured around essential questions&#8212;instruction that can&#8217;t be reduced to a downloadable set of answers.  </p>
<p>I like your point about academic integrity and bringing ethics into the conversation. The cheating question has always seemed to me to be related to the question of why we&#8217;re in school, intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation, etc.  If students are motivated to learn for authentic reasons and are acting as advocates of their own learning, cheating  becomes reductio ad absurdum. Have to say though: being an advocate for one&#8217;s own learning is not the same as being an advocate for one&#8217;s academic &#8220;career.&#8221; So there&#8217;s the usual grain of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregg</title>
		<link>http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/04/27/itunes/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/04/27/itunes/#comment-867</guid>
		<description>One advantage of teachers using IPods may be that in learning about the technology they can better defend against it&#039;s use for cheating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One advantage of teachers using IPods may be that in learning about the technology they can better defend against it&#8217;s use for cheating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

