<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reflective learning &#8212; following the conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/07/13/reflective-learning-following-the-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/07/13/reflective-learning-following-the-conversation/</link>
	<description>technology, libraries, and schools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:29:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Not So Distant Future &#187; Making the potion: Focusing on the research process</title>
		<link>http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/07/13/reflective-learning-following-the-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>Not So Distant Future &#187; Making the potion: Focusing on the research process</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/07/13/reflective-learning-following-the-conversation/#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>[...] few days ago, I wrote about reflective learning, and really identified with Will Richardson&#8217;s and David Warlick&#8217;s comments about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few days ago, I wrote about reflective learning, and really identified with Will Richardson&#8217;s and David Warlick&#8217;s comments about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Tucker</title>
		<link>http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/07/13/reflective-learning-following-the-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/07/13/reflective-learning-following-the-conversation/#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link and the compliment! I like how you summarized it here as focusing on the process rather than only the finished product. I wonder how assessment works when you&#039;re focusing on the process though; if there&#039;s too much focus on just the process, nothing would ever get finished. I&#039;m not convinced that&#039;s realistic; we do have to complete projects in the real world. The idea you shared about the Occasional Papers intrigued me because it does show end points, or at least milestones where a project winds down. I understand where David Warlick is coming from that much of learning is never finished, but I think we also have to make concessions to the idea that we need milestones along the way. I know that I need places to pause and reflect and get feedback in my own learning. Maybe that&#039;s still process though, at a bigger level. Can it be a process with many products along the way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link and the compliment! I like how you summarized it here as focusing on the process rather than only the finished product. I wonder how assessment works when you&#8217;re focusing on the process though; if there&#8217;s too much focus on just the process, nothing would ever get finished. I&#8217;m not convinced that&#8217;s realistic; we do have to complete projects in the real world. The idea you shared about the Occasional Papers intrigued me because it does show end points, or at least milestones where a project winds down. I understand where David Warlick is coming from that much of learning is never finished, but I think we also have to make concessions to the idea that we need milestones along the way. I know that I need places to pause and reflect and get feedback in my own learning. Maybe that&#8217;s still process though, at a bigger level. Can it be a process with many products along the way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn Foote</title>
		<link>http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/07/13/reflective-learning-following-the-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn Foote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/07/13/reflective-learning-following-the-conversation/#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>I agree, Doug.  How to get that across better or work as a team better with teachers is something I want to discuss and think about more.
By the way, I am planning another post on this idea of reflection and extending but more focused on the library specifically!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Doug.  How to get that across better or work as a team better with teachers is something I want to discuss and think about more.<br />
By the way, I am planning another post on this idea of reflection and extending but more focused on the library specifically!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Johnson</title>
		<link>http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/07/13/reflective-learning-following-the-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/07/13/reflective-learning-following-the-conversation/#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>One of the things I&#039;ve noticed is that when we ask students to follow an information problem solving model like the Big6, we tend to ignore the 1st step of defining the task and the last step of evaluating the product and the process. It&#039;s the final step where we need to ask students to reflect on both how good their product was AND how effective they were in doing their work. I&#039;d ask students to always answer the question &quot;What will I do differently next time to improve my work and skills?&quot;

Just a thought. Enjoyed your post,

Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things I&#8217;ve noticed is that when we ask students to follow an information problem solving model like the Big6, we tend to ignore the 1st step of defining the task and the last step of evaluating the product and the process. It&#8217;s the final step where we need to ask students to reflect on both how good their product was AND how effective they were in doing their work. I&#8217;d ask students to always answer the question &#8220;What will I do differently next time to improve my work and skills?&#8221;</p>
<p>Just a thought. Enjoyed your post,</p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
