Not So Distant Future

technology, libraries, and schools

Not So Distant Future

TCEA Presentation–Facebook uses in education

February 9th, 2011 · No Comments · Web 2.0

Our school is making efforts to allow teachers to use professional facebook accounts to communicate with their students.  Dustin Windsor, our technology coordinator, and I shared in a session at TCEA how our school embarked on this process.  The slides and notes from our presentation are below.

Links to resource materials we used as a district to make this decision.

Tags:···

TCEA presentation–21st century library issues

February 9th, 2011 · No Comments · Web 2.0

I’ll be leading conversations about the issues facing librarians during a session at TCEA on February 9 from 10:30 to 11:30.  We’ll be using a specially designed “idea” space at the conference to foster discussions about many areas of concern facing librarians.  Feel free to join in remotely via the tools below.

If you are participating remotely, please join in brainstorming some of  issues that are placing pressure on libraries to change by posting them on our corkboard.

We’ll be sharing notes from the session on this Titanpad page.

These slides are points of discussion from the session, and a short list of resources to get the conversation started.  I will be updating this blog post with the slideshow from the beginning portion of the workshop this evening.

Tags:

Librarians as Leaders

February 6th, 2011 · 3 Comments · Web 2.0

In a recent article on librarians as leaders which I wrote for TCEA’s Tech Edge magazine, I was puzzling over the issues related to librarians as leaders in schools, particularly their role as technology leaders and how they can ideally work as part of a team with the school technology staff.

The skills demanded of librarians for the last decade, particularly, overlap and complement the skills of instructional technologists, but developing a relationship of mutual respect is sometimes a challenge.   I sometimes find myself frustrated by my hybrid role–longing not to”just”be relegated to the role of librarian, but envisioning the modern librarian as “something more”–wanting librarians to be thought of as just another facet of instructional technology expertise. (Thus, my technolibrarian moniker on twitter).   We bring a great deal to the table, which is partially what I explore in the article, but are we equal partners at the “tech table” in discussions about purchases or filtering, for example;  discussions that could draw on our expertise?  I hear frustration expressed by many librarians in these areas.

As a librarian, I’d rather not be relegated to a “second class” technology citizen and appreciate it when my own expertise is valued for the unique elements that I can bring to the table to help teachers and students.   I appreciate when it’s respected that I know what is needed to align our library services with the 21st century learning literacies we are trying to teach.   But again, for librarians, that is often not the case.  Librarians frequently have to fight and scrap their way into using technology–begging permission to use a tool or purchase a technology item, or  facing battles against web filters when they try to blog or use sites for instruction.

What I would hope for, and outline in the article, are ways that technologists and librarians can ideally function as a team, there to help students and teachers.   A team which is innovative, mutually respectful and forward thinking–who can collaborate with teachers on assignments together and provide students and teachers with the best instruction available.

Libraries are rapidly evolving, and librarians have to be able to embrace that change.  But as the role and functionality of libraries change, the interpretation of what the domain of librarian is needs to evolve too.    How to get there–that is the question.   It’s time for some collaborative conversations on the partnerships that we can build within our professions, between our professional organizations who too often work in isolation, and within our own buildings to bring better service to our students.     These are difficult questions to work out, and our answers are constantly evolving.  But I”m curious -what models are you seeing in your own states and districts that are working?

Tags:

Keeping advocacy focused

January 24th, 2011 · 1 Comment · Web 2.0

Tightening budgets in many states and local school districts (including the one in which I live) remind me of the importance of having a focused advocacy message for library positions/technology budgets.   Texas is facing a severe budget shortfall, as is my local city’s school district, and library and technology budgets are on the line with drastic cuts proposed.

Last spring I had the opportunity to hear the inspirational Spokane Moms, amazing parent advocates from Spokane who had many insightful suggestions about how to effectively advocate for a cause at the state and local levels (my blog post about their very important points is here).

They emphasized again and again how much the voice of parents and businesses matter, but that the message must always be focused on students, not on the staff.  

Hearing that both local library positions are threatened, as is the state technology fund allotment to schools–I think it’s imperative that we focus on who this ultimately impacts–our students, our future leaders, employees, innovators, designers, entrepeneurs, and college students.

As the Spokane Moms suggest we need to:

1)  Make sure parents know the impact of recommended cuts

2)  Appeal to what is important for each constituency.  If we are speaking to state legislators, what is important in THEIR districts?    If we are speaking to local school boards, what is important in THEIR district/school?  

3)  Keep it focused on students, students, students.  How do the cuts impact their learning experience or disadvantage them?

4)  Use the power of local businesses and the business community.  Do these cuts affect their future employees?  Does it affect their community?   How is this important to them?

5)  Utilize the power of social media.   I’ve watched in awe the last two weeks as parents in the Austin school district have organized via Facebook, Twitter, and pooled their efforts into a website that is used by all the schools.  In a completely grass-roots effort, they created a common hashtag #saveatxschools and common Facebook group pages, then organized events like picnics, marches, tshirts, signage, all using the power of social media to garner the attention of the conventional media.  

6)  Remember that parents are central to effective advocacy both locally and statewide.  They want the best for their children as all of us do for their students.  They vote and their voices and participation in this process matters.

On these two issues–library funding both state and local, and the state technology allotment, there are important issues at stake.   And we have to keep reminding everyone that this is about our students, our children, and their learning and future.   That message can ring through loud and clear.

Tags:

iPads in the elementary library

January 13th, 2011 · 5 Comments · Web 2.0

One way to use iPads in the elementary library is as part of “stations.”   The touch screen and variety of available apps make it a natural for learning stations.

One of our elementary librarians and I spent time recently exploring apps for her students, and found some excellent apps that would work well for reading/learning stations in the library.  She envisions setting up stations where younger elementary students could record themselves reading,  read an audiobook and follow along, or learn the alphabet, among other things.

We found a number of excellent apps and instructional ideas from this excellent series of posts from Burley Elementary School in Chicago that set us on a search for inexpensive apps.

First up– we discovered Blue FiRe, a free recording app for the iPad.  The controls are very simple and intuitive and the app is free.  Students can record themselves reading a book and listen back to it, or the library staff could pre-record some book “teasers.”  The ease of use of this app is excellent–you can pause the recording or even stop it and go back and add to it later, and it seamlessly stitches the recording together.   It stores the recordings in a list, and the titles of the recordings can be edited.  They can be exported off of the iPad via FTP.

We also decided on the free Alphabet Tracing app, which both allows students to trace their letters, but then also reads aloud the letter and a word associated with the letter; it also allows students to practice eye-hand coordination in tracing their numbers.   There is a blank screen where students can write their own letters and words, and it also allows students to customize colors and patterns for their own “pen,” which adds a more creative element to this particular app.  The ABC Cursive app is another nice alphabet/writing app.   While some may be opposed to emphasizing handwriting, for some students,  particularly those with dylexia or other special needs, the eye-hand coordination practice and tracing can be helpful.

The new Nook for Kids app is going to be an excellent resource for libraries.  The books have a “Read by Myself” or “Read to Me” feature which would be great for library reading stations.   It allows you to pause the reading also, allowing the child to really look at the page or stop the “read aloud” and read the page silently.

And as a safeguard, the app doesn’t “automatically” allow items to be downloaded when installed;  it asks for the parent’s password to either enter the store or change any settings, a nice feature for schools.    The color books render very well.

There are many other “reading” apps for the iPad of course.   Tumblebooks has a variety of individual books available, though we are hoping they will have an iPad app of their own soon.

ICDL‘s free app (International Children’s Digital Library) is well done–with hundreds of books and ways to search for the kind of book, language, etc.

ipadappOf course individual books abound, some free, some not.  Talkie Books offers Beatrix Potter books, some free, like Tommy Tiptoes, and some for a fee, and each is read aloud.   Cooper’s Pack Travel Guide to Seattle is another nice free book app for elementary readers in the middle grades–it uses the more interactive features of the iPad and asks students to interact with the book.

School Library Journal’s latest issue features an article by Elizabeth Bird, offering valuable advice on evaluating books for the iPad  as well as reviews of some interesting e-books(not free).  I tried one of the books she reviewed, Pop Up Peter (Beatrix Potter) which has the features of a real popup book, and it is nicely done(and inexpensive at $2.99)

Though one of the attractive features about the iPad is its mobility, the use of the touchscreen at “reading stations” allows you to extend the use of an iPad if you have limited numbers of iPads available(or only one), and leverages the power of the apps for student learning and reading.

Tags:··

A paradigm shift–”Connection” development?

January 6th, 2011 · 3 Comments · Web 2.0

flickrconnectionssliceofdelightRecently, one of our teachers inquired about the copyright legality of using Netflix in the classroom.    I queried my twitter network to see what the general librarian consensus was as well, because I suspected it was probably against Netflix terms of service (which it is) for reasons I couldn’t quite explain, so I turned to my network for help.

The discussion that ensued demonstrated yet again how nebulous and confusing the whole notion of copyright is in regards to schools anymore.  For one thing, I wish Netflix did provide for corporate accounts or the ability to use it “legally” in schools, but I have no doubt that soon it or a service like it will offer that sort of subscription service.  (Librarians and teachers–time to lobby Netflix for just such a thing?)

But out of the conversation rose an even more concerning/challenging question in my mind.   The rapidity with which what it means to be called a library is changing is stunning.  In the year it took to build our new library, for example, nonfiction reference went into sharp decline.  Kindles and Nooks appeared, then iPads, changing the notion of what it could mean to “lend” materials;  e-books have made a comeback after the earlier successes of Netlibrary.   And then services like United Streaming (education) and Netflix (commercial) became more available over the web, through new iPad apps….and then the burning question to me becomes–

What does “collection development” (a librariany term) even  mean for a school librarian anymore?

It’s a deeply challenging, complex, and somewhat troubling notion that can strike at the heart of our librarian identity.

So perhaps it is  time we turn the notion of “collection development” into “connection development.”    And wasn’t that always really the point anyway?–not the collection itself, but the connections it allowed our customers(students, teachers) to make; although the focus has too often been more on the collection than on the people involved.  (Consequently decisions are made to preserve libraries but cut staff, expend money on things instead of professional development, and to teach collection development in isolation in MLIS programs.)

But if we move the focus to what the materials allow our students and staff and patrons to do–things begin to make more sense.

Librarians are connectors in many ways.  We connect, as I’ve said before, people with ideas, people with people, people with creativity.  We connect people and ideas across time and space and geography, just as we always have, except now we can do it “in real time” via Skype or Twitter or Facebook.

Even now that many resources are digital, we do serve as sort of “connection experts”–knowing as many resources as possible to help people more easily find what will serve their needs, whether the resources are print, or increasingly, online.

Even the discussion about Netflix demonstrates the “connection development” role we play–teachers look to us for clarification on issues that these rapid “format” changes bring to their classrooms, and we connect to others to find answers or deepen our own understanding.

Even knowing that, I sometimes get troubled by the complexity of that answer, which isn’t an excuse or justification of libraries or a rationalization, but my real belief in the function that we provide in our schools.   Because people don’t like complexity, and particularly policy makers don’t.   It’s easy to see everything become digital and ask, somewhat legitimately, what are our libraries for?

A glance into a library, an afternoon spent with a class, a morning spent watching students interact with information explains what libraries and librarians are for, but that takes time and understanding that the complexities of grappling with digital information is just as complex as grappling with print information.

But again, understanding all those complexities takes critical thought and deeper understanding (ironically something librarians endeavor to teach our students), rather than the quick quip about digital learners and a “sink or swim” attitude as far as students go.

And even sitting here, myself a librarian, thinking about the possibility of Netflix streaming into classrooms, about students browsing Google, about the information explosion–I don’t wonder if we are needed, but I wonder how our “mediating” role or connective role changes when the information flows from the source directly to the classroom.  It’s a complex question.

I know what we do is needed.  But what becomes ever more important is our connection– our connection to our staff and students, our ability to “hook people up” with what they need, our connection to resources of all kinds, and providing others an ability to connect with us in both digital and physical spaces.

We have to break through that barrier where consumers think we are just the purveyors of “stuff”–because it never was really about the “stuff ” anyway.  It was about access to ideas–about finding answers–about learning and connection–connection to our present and to our past as a culture.

But we can’t help others see that if we don’t really understand it ourselves.

……………………………………………………….

To see connecting at work, here’s the twitter conversation from Tuesday–(in backwards order):

dmcordell dmcordell

@technolibrary So relevant to our Netflix conversation yesterday! http://www.unshelved.com/2011-1-5 via @oodja

khokanson  @technolibrary that’s why I mentioned license license terms trump fair use I don’t use netflix so dnk their terms

  • Laura Pearle VennLibrarian

    @buffyjhamilton @technolibrary @joycevalenza @khokanson recent rentals? “Farmingville POV”, “Charly”, “Viva Cuba”, “Frida” and “Helvetica” 32 minutes ago via yoono in reply to buffyjhamilton

  • Laura Pearle VennLibrarian

    @buffyjhamilton @technolibrary @joycevalenza @khokanson Verrrrry interesting: just asked to recertify that I understand the Netflix TOS! 36 minutes ago via yoono in reply to buffyjhamilton

  • Buffy Hamilton buffyjhamilton

    @VennLibrarian @technolibrary @joycevalenza @khokanson what kinds of titles are you using? When I spoke w/ Netflix, they said no, period. 43 minutes ago via TweetDeck in reply to VennLibrarian

  • Laura Pearle VennLibrarian

    @buffyjhamilton @technolibrary @joycevalenza @khokanson since Netflix is purely for ed. content, I’m not as concerned w/Movie Lic 44 minutes ago via yoono in reply to buffyjhamilton

  • Buffy Hamilton buffyjhamilton

    @VennLibrarian @technolibrary @joycevalenza @khokanson I’d want in writing from MovieLic USA they were authorized to cover Netflix rentals. about 1 hour ago via TweetDeck in reply to VennLibrarian

  • Laura Pearle VennLibrarian

    @buffyjhamilton @technolibrary @joycevalenza @khokanson we purchase any that more than one teacher wants (or will be used in future) (2/2) about 1 hour ago via yoono in reply to buffyjhamilton

  • Laura Pearle VennLibrarian

    @buffyjhamilton @technolibrary @joycevalenza @khokanson We have Movie License and only allow teachers to use Netflix for ed. purposes (1/2) about 1 hour ago via yoono in reply to buffyjhamilton


  • C Foote technolibrary

    @buffyhamilton @vennlibrarian @joycevalenza @khokanson but Netflix is a subscription–maybe that’s the issue here. Subscription 2:50 PM Jan 4th via web

    Our Env. Science teacher was using a documentary, for example. @khokanson I tend to agree w/you on the fair use. If instructional…

  •  Kristin Hokanson khokanson

    @technolibrary regardless of the source of the content…a use of copyrighted material is a fair use if it meets the 4 factors about 1 hour ago via TweetDeck in reply to technolibrary

  •  Kristin Hokanson khokanson

    @maryakem @technolibrary I think the big question is how is the video being used-for entertainment? not fair use for scholarship? depends about 1 hour ago via TweetDeck

  • Keisa Williams keisawilliams

    @technolibrary @joycevalenza @buffyhamilton @khokanson what if you check out a video from the public libr 4a class 2view? Legal? about 1 hour ago via Twitter for iPhone in reply to technolibrary

  • Maryann Kempthorne maryakem

    @technolibrary @joycevalenza @buffyhamilton @khokanson Netflix in schools. Forget copyright implications! Worry resource quality/relevance?? about 1 hour ago via web in reply to technolibrary

  • dmcordell dmcordell

    @technolibrary Netflix not enforcing,yet http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/netflix_turns_a_blind_eye_to_illegal_use_by_school.php #tlchat

  • buffyjhamilton
  • @technolibrary they are encouraged to use the educational videos available through MediaCast, Facts on File, and Discovery Streaming. about 1 hour ago via TweetDeck in reply to technolibrary Buffy Hamilton buffyjhamilton

    @technolibrary our district encourages teachers to be very selective when showing full length movies…. about 1 hour ago via TweetDeck in reply to technolibrary dmcordell dmcordell

    @technolibrary I found this re. academic libraries’ use of Netflix http://tinyurl.com/278ztvx #tlchat about 1 hour ago via web kvoss micdslibrary

    @technolibrary @dmcordell wouldn’t fair use apply if it was a one-time classroom thing, for edu purposes? about 1 hour ago via TweetDeck in reply to technolibrary dmcordell dmcordell

    @technolibrary If nothing else, I would think these restrictions apply http://dmcordell.blogspot.com/2010/11/copyright-caution.html #tlchat about 1 hour ago via web in reply to technolibrary Buffy Hamilton buffyjhamilton

    @technolibrary not sure if I have the email now since it was a year, but basically to use violates the TOS. about 1 hour ago via TweetDeck in reply to technolibrary Kathy Kaldenberg scsdmedia

    @technolibrary http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/columns/practice/read-fine-print Think twice before you click “accept” about 1 hour ago via TweetDeck in reply to technolibrary Buffy Hamilton buffyjhamilton

    @technolibrary @joycevalenza @buffyhamilton @khokanson will see if I can find my email about it–not sure if I still have it, but I called. about 1 hour ago via TweetDeck in reply to technolibrary buffyjhamilton

    @technolibrary @joycevalenza @buffyhamilton @khokanson I actually contacted them about this about a year ago–basically, not legal.

    C Foote technolibrary

    Netflix in schools–@joycevalenza @buffyhamilton @khokanson What do you think the copyright ramifications are, if any?

    ……………………………………………………….

    photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sliceofdelight/5171549713/sizes/s/in/photostream/

    Tags:

    Why Teachers should be “Person of the Year”

    December 22nd, 2010 · No Comments · Web 2.0

    Time Magazine recently announced that Mark Zuckerberg was selected as their “Person of the Year.”    It seems a rather peculiar choice, since not only is Facebook “old hat”  but also because Facebook has not been the best player in regards to user privacy.

    So I have my own end of the year suggestion for Time Magazine–how about making teachers the “Person of the Year”?

    Yes, teachers.   After 29 years in education, both as a teacher and librarian, I”ve known a great number of educators.  And what I’ve seen demonstrated again and again by so many of my colleagues is how much, despite all the recent hype to the contrary, they care about children.

    So instead of this being the year of software mega-giant or of the likes of Michelle Rhee or Davis Guggenheim,  or the year of union busting in education–perhaps this should be the year we begin simply to honor and celebrate teachers.

    Teaching is a complex job.  There’s the subject matter, which is complex in and of itself;  there are the students, who are complex in all the ways every human being is, and there’s the place in between where you figure out how to bring the two together for real understanding and growth.  And again, despite claims to the contrary about experienced teachers, you could spend a lifetime as an educator honing your skills and still not master any one of these areas, no matter how dedicated you are.

    Being a teacher means reinventing yourself daily and annually to meet the needs of the students in front of you, whether it’s figuring out a way to reach a particular student or learning the latest ways to connect your students to a global learning environment.

    And so my heroes, my “Persons of the Year” are teachers like Diane Laufenberg, whose creative and authentic work with students in her classroom at the Science Leadership Academy in Philadelphia takes them out into the field to interview voters.  Or teachers like Vicki Davis, who leads her middle school students to a better understanding of a global world.   Or teachers like Karl Fisch, a technology specialist who, when brought back into the classroom, brought his talents to bear in rethinking what it means to teach Algebra in a wired world.  Or teachers like Lee Kolbert, another returnee to the classroom, who agonized over navigating the path between the practical daily realities of the classroom and the ideals to which she hears around her.  Or principals like Chris Lehmann at the Science Leadership Academy, who leads his own advisory period like every teacher in his building.

    Or the teacher at my own campus, who sat side by side with a student during her off period, like so many teachers across this nation do, gently coaching and encouraging her through her math lesson.   Or the teacher at my school who recognized the stress students face in a high achieving school, and took creative steps to transform the school culture.  Or the coach at my school who works evenings, weekends, and vacations with his students to bring out the best in them, away from his own family to do that.  Or the library staff at my own library, who sit with a student and help him edit his college application letter one-on-one, or nurture students who just want to connect with an adult in the school.

    Teachers, librarians, and counselors are there helping those students because they care.  And it’s not just about the heroics, it’s about the quiet, day to day care and support that they give students;  it’s about the late hours, the way you live/eat/breathe teaching; it’s about the passion and dedication that teachers bring to what really is almost an impossible job.

    And so I believe it is time for our nation to respect teachers, value them, and care about them.  It’s time for the nation to recognize those quiet heroes who care for all our children and do their best to reach them.   It’s time for our nation to acknowledge, that although there are teachers who struggle, more often than not, side by side with them are teachers who are quietly dedicated to students and performing the real heroics of raising up our children.

    That, Time Magazine, is why I think teachers should be “Person of the Year.”

    This post is cross posted at Huffington Post.

    Tags:

    A Kindling we go

    December 13th, 2010 · No Comments · Web 2.0

    kindle Libraries are definitely on the brink of a paradigm shift in terms of  lending.  In an effort to give a variety of e-book options a try for my students, we invested in four Kindles a few months ago.  Teachers had the first opportunities to check them out, but we began with student check-outs two weeks ago.

    We had already invested in a variety of other e-book options for students, like e-books embedded in our catalog from Follett and Gale, but so far, the Kindle has gotten the most response from students for fiction reading.  In fact, I only advertised the availability of the Kindles on our library website, but didn’t offer much other fanfare, and students have been lining up to check them out.

    We are using a checkout process similar to one Buffy Hamilton outlined in her excellent posts on using Kindles, with a permission slip from parents that we modified, and a one-week check out period initially.

    One feature I am finding  intriguing is that you can load .pdf files or .txt files on the Kindle, among other types of files.  If you attach your Kindle to your computer, it adds it as a viewable drive, and you can simply drag the .pdf or .txt or even .mp3 files to the Kindle desktop and place them in the appropriate folder.

    (PDF files don’t always render as beautifully as you might like if the fonts are small in the original document as this demo points out, but the demo video also suggests some fixes that improve the visibility of a .pdf including switching to landscape mode.)

    The ability to add .PDF files adds some interesting ideas for teachers/librarians–you could load a document on how to create MLA format for the books on the Kindle, or review documents for a particular subject or readings for a class, etc.    Students could upload sheet music for their original compositions or their own “poetry” collected in a .pdf, etc. – a lot of options to expand the notion of reading beyond “published” texts become possible on the device.

    But the best thing about the Kindle so far, for me as a librarian, is the paradigm shift of  buying “books on demand.”  When a student has needed a particular book and wants to check out the Kindle, it provides for student driven, immediate ”collection development.”  Instead of purchasing “just in case” or receiving items weeks after they are needed, the Kindles provide us with the possibility of purchasing a book THE DAY it is needed.   Now certainly, this is limited by the number of Kindles we have currently, and time of staff, etc., but it certainly creates an interesting and student friendly model of book purchasing.

    There are of course downsides–some books are more expensive than I’d want to pay, some aren’t available, and maintaining a large number of devices could get cumbersome.

    And lest we think all print books could be replaced this way, students still gravitate towards print books as well, as we straddle two environments.  In an ongoing survey that has been running on our school library website, that uncertainty is reflected–about 30% of students responding select “maybe” in regards to using an e-book.  And even though schools  like Cushing Academy have eliminated many books, as it turns out, despite the headlines to the contrary that they didn’t eliminate ALL print books either.

    However, as librarians, it’s important we take these first steps towards providing tools for our students and be open to a paradigm shift about book purchasing.   Where that will ultimately lead–an all e-book collection, a 1:1 device school library, a combination of the above, we don’t yet know.

    Tags:

    Librarians–shifting the paradigm

    December 11th, 2010 · 4 Comments · Web 2.0

    draperlisteningflickr A common thread of discussion among wired librarians is the struggle they face in getting recognized for how technologically connected they are and how students rely on their services for assistance.

    In most high schools, particularly, the library itself is fairly “wired”–outfitted with computers and devices of all kinds for multimedia productions and research uses, online catalogs and databases, scanners, etc.   To librarians, these are ubiquitous tools that are just in a day’s work.  Recently I was asked on an application to explain the ways I used technology in the library.  I had a difficult time separating out how I use technology, because as a librarian, I don’t “use” technology–it’s just embedded into everything we do.

    Yet, often, the fact that many of a librarian’s daily activities rely on their proficiency with technology can be overlooked both at the administrative level and in the public at large.  And too often librarians find themselves struggling to get the resources they need, or being treated like second class technological users within their schools, or discounted by policy makers,  instead of recognized as the strong, tech savvy leaders for students that they are, and can be.

    The Speak up 2009 National survey by Project Tomorrow paints a picture of the strong role librarians play in schools regarding technology use in student learning. The survey showed that in all but two of 9 categories, librarian use of technology far exceeds that of teachers and even students(as reported in Knowledge Quest November/December 2010).

    Just a few of the numbers tell the tale–according to the survey, thirty-four percent  of librarians used a social network to seek help, 33% posted to a blog (compared to 18% of teachers surveyed), 25% found other experts online to assist them , and 22% started a wiki or blog (compared to 10% of teachers surveyed).   Students bested librarians only in the categories of playing online games and finding an online tutor.

    On social networks, another example of librarians’  leadership with technology is evidenced by the number of nominations librarians received for the recent Edublog Awards in every different category.

    The point is, librarians are out there on the “social network” in a big way.  Sure, not all of them, but a significant and growing percentage of librarians are providing leadership on their campuses by using technology in embedded ways.   It’s about the students they are helping, leading, sharing with and teaching.

    Librarians bring a great deal to the table–as quasi “social scientists” they witness students’ and teachers’ information gathering and technology use behaviors first hand;  they have an “across the curriculum view”, they are creative,  they understand filtering issues from a “student freedom of information” issue, they are copyright experts, they are strategic planners trying to look down the road and provide vision, they are collaborative and they are willing to share, both within their buildings and 24/7 on social networks.

    Maybe it’s time that the story being told about libraries and librarians reflects what libraries really look like.  We’re not reframing by using technology to “stay vital” as articles so often suggest–we’re reframing because that’s what our students and teachers need.  And that’s who we are there for.

    It’s time the paradigm changed.  Because we did.

    photo credit: Darren Draper

    Listen

    Tags:

    Edublog Awards addendum part 3

    November 30th, 2010 · 3 Comments · Web 2.0

    When I was completing the Edublog Awards, I realized how few “new” bloggers I promote or read regularly.  (In fact, one of the things that appeals to me about the awards is that it brings so many new blogs to my attention).  Recently, this blog from the “new school librarian” Melissa Corey cut through the “internet clutter” and caught my eye.   A self-proclaimed geek with a human touch, in her profile, she beautifully describes what a “new school librarian” looks like:

    Yes, I am new on the job.  But I also bring a new perspective to the job.  I see the importance of information in the lives of today’s populous.  I simply use new ways of meeting these needs.  Our collection is smaller but of higher quality.  Our facility is remodeled to be user-friendly.  Our use of technology reaches the user on their terms, on their time.  It’s a new philosophy of school librarianship.  I am a new school librarian.

    For her honest and well-written accounts of her efforts as a new librarian and blogger, I’d like to honor The New School Librarian’s blog for Best New Blog in the Edublog Awards.  I look forward to reading more from her!

    Tags: